Second call for RIPE 51 agenda topics and comments on RIPE 50 minutes
Dear all, this is the second call for agenda items for the ENUM WG meeting at RIPE 51 in Amsterdam. In the meantime we got some proposals that can be nicely bundled into a "Provisioning" theme. Your co-chairs are happy that such a theme is felt of being of such wide interest that the ENUM WG got a 90 min slot allotted during the plenary part of the meeting, for the presentations and a subsequent panel discussion. However, any other ideas are still very much welcome, too - as usual. :-) Please send in your suggestions and proposals. This is also the second call for comments and/or corrections you may have re. the RIPE 50 ENUM WG draft minutes. The last revision is still also the first revision, available at: http://www.ripe.net/ripe/wg/enum/minutes/r50-minutes.html Thanks and best regards, Carsten Schiefner
Carsten Schiefner wrote:
Dear all,
this is the second call for agenda items for the ENUM WG meeting at RIPE 51 in Amsterdam.
Well I cant personally make it but there is progress on the North American Front ... see attached letter to the US ENUM LLC from the US state dept.. I'm reasonably confident that trials in the US can begin late this year.
In the meantime we got some proposals that can be nicely bundled into a "Provisioning" theme. Your co-chairs are happy that such a theme is felt of being of such wide interest that the ENUM WG got a 90 min slot allotted during the plenary part of the meeting, for the presentations and a subsequent panel discussion.
I can certainly testify to the intense interest in provisioning issues on this side of the pond. In particular we're looking at SOAP/XML interfaces to the registry. The reason for this is that EPP ( which is a fine protocol ) was designed for the highly unique business model of domain name registries and simply will not integrate into the kinds of customer management systems teleco typically deploy. EPP was designed in the manner it is because the IETF has a really really stupid policy ( RFC 3205 ) on the use of HTTP as a application substrate.
However, any other ideas are still very much welcome, too - as usual. :-) Please send in your suggestions and proposals.
I'd personally suggest a roundtable discussion ... Is ENUM the IP-SCP? Can ENUM kill the SS7 dragon?
This is also the second call for comments and/or corrections you may have re. the RIPE 50 ENUM WG draft minutes. The last revision is still also the first revision, available at:
http://www.ripe.net/ripe/wg/enum/minutes/r50-minutes.html
Thanks and best regards,
Carsten Schiefner
--
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Richard Shockey, Director - Member of Technical Staff NeuStar Inc. 46000 Center Oak Plaza - Sterling, VA 20166 sip:rshockey(at)iptel.org sip:57141(at)fwd.pulver.com ENUM +87810-13313-31331 PSTN Office +1 571.434.5651 PSTN Mobile +1 703.593.2683 Fax: +1 815.333.1237 <mailto:richard(at)shockey.us> or <mailto:richard.shockey(at)neustar.biz> <http://www.neustar.biz> ; <http://www.enum.org> <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<
participants (2)
-
Carsten Schiefner -
Richard Shockey