Proposal for non-geographic ENUM E.164 UPTS for the general public
hi everyone/anyone... ;) accounting the lack of criticism i suppose the proposal is generally considered acceptable. well then i'd suggest to vote on this proposal on ripe49. kind regards, Chris Heinze
On 29 Jul 2004, at 10:06, Chris Heinze wrote:
accounting the lack of criticism i suppose the proposal is generally considered acceptable.
Or else that everyone missed it, like me! Best regards, Niall O'Reilly
Hi Chris, Chris Heinze wrote:
accounting the lack of criticism i suppose the proposal is generally considered acceptable.
...or hardly anyone had the opportunity to digest it so far. AFAIK counting the subscribers to this list is still possible with two hands.
well then i'd suggest to vote on this proposal on ripe49.
In the light of the above said, this is most likely premature - unfortunately... Cheers, -C.
On Jul 30, 2004, at 14:42, Carsten Schiefner wrote:
Hi Chris,
Chris Heinze wrote:
accounting the lack of criticism i suppose the proposal is generally considered acceptable.
...or hardly anyone had the opportunity to digest it so far. AFAIK counting the subscribers to this list is still possible with two hands.
This will be resolved shortly. Kim and myself (the two co-chairs for this wg) are sitting beside each other today to resolve issues like these. Regards, Patrik
participants (4)
-
Carsten Schiefner -
Chris Heinze -
Niall O'Reilly -
Patrik Fältström