1. What is the country and E.164 code? PL 48 2. Who is the delegate for the E.164 code? With the consent of the Ministry of Infrastructure, NASK is the domain name holder for 8.4.e164.arpa. 3. The status of deployment TRIAL 4. ENUM Project contact details (telephone, email, web) NASK Andrzej Bartosiewicz, Research and Academic Computer Network 18 Wawozowa Str 02-796 Warsaw www.DNS.pl +48.225231204, andrzejb@nask.pl 5. Is a trial being, or going to be, conducted? Conducted since July 2002. 6. Is there work or plans toward full permanent deployment? Yes. ENUM Registry, protocol (based on EPP), administrative procedures are ready. From technical and administrative point of view Tier-1 registry is already deployed. 7. Who is leading the ENUM project? (government, industry working group, etc.) NASK + Office of Telecommunications and Post Regulation (URTiP, www.URTIP.gov.pl) 8. Who operates the ccTLD for that country at present? NASK Research and Academic Computer Network 18 Wawozowa Str 02-796 Warsaw www.DNS.pl +48.225231204 9. What type of organisation runs the ccTLD? (state, private, academic, etc.) State, R&D status http://www.nask.pl/run/n/Who_we_are 10. What is the ccTLD legal regulation, if any? see: http://www.nask.pl/run/n/Who_we_are 11. Who is the current Tier 1 registry? NASK Research and Academic Computer Network 18 Wawozowa Str 02-796 Warsaw www.DNS.pl +48.225231204NASK 12. Who is, or will be, the permanent Tier 1 registry? NASK Research and Academic Computer Network 18 Wawozowa Str 02-796 Warsaw www.DNS.pl +48.225231204 13. How will the Tier 1 registry selection be made? (i.e. decision, license, concession, agreement, public procurement, etc.) DECISION 14. How will the method of cost recovery for the Tier 1 registry's operations? Annual fee per registered number / year (ca. 2 - 5 EUR) 15. Will there be more than one Tier 1 provider for the country? NO 16. Will there be ENUM registrars? YES, REGISTRAR = TSP 17. What will be the ENUM validation technique? NASK accepts all "create" requests from TSPs without validation. "Update" can be done if the correct "authInfo" is provided by the new TSP. "Transfer" can be done if the correct "authInfo" is provided by the new TSP. Generally: If TSP provides the false data, TSP is subject to prosecution (TSP must comply with Telecommunication Act) 18. Is there/will there be a special number block for ENUM and/or IP Telephony? NO 19. Is there special treatment for unlisted numbers? Only valid E164 numbers assigned by Office of Telecommunications and Post Regulation (URTiP) can be registered. 20. Are there any plans for infrastructure ENUM? a.Infrastructure ENUM is one of the possibilities for Number Portability Administration Center (NASK's project) b. Infrastructure ENUM is platform for cost optimization solutions (NASK + Warsaw University of Technology) 21. What is your ENUM WHOIS address? http://www.dns.pl/cgi-bin/enum_lookup.pl 22. Please provide the history of ENUM trials, projects etc., if any. History: July 18, 2002 delegation, 2002 - 2004: trial May 19, 2004: Registry software ready, protocol defined 23. What are your future plans? (and dates if available) TBD 24. What is your date estimate on a production ENUM registry launch? May 19, 2004
Hello, Here are the answers for Japan. Hiro =================
What is the country and E.164 code?
Japan, +81
Who is the delegate for the E.164 code?
None (currently)
The status of deployment (notdelegated>applied>delegated/objected>trial>hiatus>production)
notdelegated trial is done under 1.8.e164.jp
ENUM Project contact details (telephone, email, web)
organizations : JPNIC and JPRS E-mail : sec@etjp.jp
Is a trial being, or going to be, conducted?
A trial is on the way It's without officially delegation but is recognized and participated in by the government
What type of numbers are being used in the trial?
Special numbers led by '000' which do not look like the existing phone numbers.
Is there work or plans toward full permanent deployment?
That should be the result of the trial.
What type of numbers are to be used in full deployment?
That should be the result of the trial.
Who is leading the ENUM project? (government, industry working group, etc.)
Trial team which mainly consists of organizations from the industry.
Who operates the ccTLD for that country at present?
JPRS
What type of organisation runs the ccTLD? (state, private, academic, etc.)
private
What is the ccTLD legal regulation, if any?
None
Who is the current Tier 1 registry?
JPRS (ccTLD for .JP) behaves as Tier 1 registry under 1.8.e164.jp
Who is, or will be, the permanent Tier 1 registry?
Not yet decided.
How will the Tier 1 registry selection be made? (i.e. decision, license, concession, agreement, public procurement, etc.)
Not yet decided.
How will the method of cost recovery for the Tier 1 registry's operations?
A recommendation can be result of the trial.
Will there be more than one Tier 1 provider for the country?
A recommendation can be result of the trial.
Will there be ENUM registrars?
Most probably.
What will be the ENUM validation technique?
A recommendation can be result of the trial.
Is there/will there be a special number block for ENUM and/or IP Telephony?
Not yet decided... under investigation by the trial team and the government.
Is there special treatment for unlisted numbers?
No.
Are there any plans for infrastructure ENUM?
That should be the result of the trial.
What is your ENUM WHOIS address?
We don't have currently ENUM WHOIS
Please provide the history of ENUM trials, projects etc., if any.
Please see http://etjp.jp/english/index.html
What are your future plans? (and dates if available)
Trial has had one year experience and it's extended by one year until Sept. 2005. Interconnection trials between communication providers including oversee communication are expected. ===
participants (2)
-
Andrzej Bartosiewicz -
HiroHOTTA