DRAFT Minutes of ENUM-WG session at RIPE 60 are available
Dear ENUM-WG Colleagues, Draft minutes of the ENUM-WG session at RIPE 60 are available at http://www.ripe.net/ripe/wg/enum/minutes/r60-minutes.html for already quite some time now. We would appreciate if you could set some time aside to review and comment on the draft and, if necessary, post objections or corrections on this list no later than 12:00 UTC on Monday, 15 November. Niall and I expect to declare these minutes "final" during the upcoming WG session at RIPE 61. Thanks to the team at the RIPE NCC for their support, and especially to Nathalie Trenaman for taking the notes. Best regards, Carsten Schiefner for the RIPE ENUM Working Group Co-Chairs
On Thu, Oct 21, 2010 at 05:50:11PM +0200, Carsten Schiefner wrote:
We would appreciate if you could set some time aside to review and comment on the draft and, if necessary, post objections or corrections on this list no later than 12:00 UTC on Monday, 15 November.
reads OK to me except I don't understand he second of these two lines and also unfortunately don't remember the wording:
Bill asked what is considered large.
Bernie said that anything K is large in DNS but that Jim Reid might have an opinion on this.
-Peter
Peter, all - Peter Koch wrote:
We would appreciate if you could set some time aside to review and comment on the draft and, if necessary, post objections or corrections on this list no later than 12:00 UTC on Monday, 15 November.
reads OK to me except I don't understand he second of these two lines and also unfortunately don't remember the wording:
Bill asked what is considered large.
Bernie said that anything K is large in DNS but that Jim Reid might have an opinion on this.
be invited to check this against the audio archives and the transcript of the session available at: http://www.ripe.net/ripe/meetings/ripe-60/archives.php?day=friday and propose a better wording. Best, Carsten
Following up (at last) on ACTION ITEM: ENUM-AP-61.1 - Niall O'Reilly, Carsten Schiefner, Peter Koch - Clarify point from RIPE 60 minutes. On 22/10/10 08:56, Carsten Schiefner wrote:
Peter, all -
Peter Koch wrote:
We would appreciate if you could set some time aside to review and comment on the draft and, if necessary, post objections or corrections on this list no later than 12:00 UTC on Monday, 15 November.
reads OK to me except I don't understand he second of these two lines and also unfortunately don't remember the wording:
Bill asked what is considered large.
Bernie said that anything K is large in DNS but that Jim Reid might have an opinion on this.
be invited to check this against the audio archives and the transcript of the session available at:
As I hear the audio, Bernie said, "anything that's a K is large ...". I understand this to mean that any DNS response of the order of 1K octets (or more) counts as large. Peter, will s/anything K/anything that's a K/ be sufficiently clear? If so, I'll ask for the authoritative copy to be amended thus. Best regards, Niall
participants (3)
-
Carsten Schiefner -
Niall O'Reilly -
Peter Koch