10 Aug
2004
10 Aug
'04
2:14 a.m.
On Aug 10, 2004, at 01:49, James Seng wrote:
IETF or RIPE WG? I'm all for it for the latter.
RIPE-WG. paf
-James Seng
Jim Reid wrote:
> "paf" == =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Patrik F=E4ltstr=F6m?= <ISO-8859-1> > writes: paf> One of the things Kim and I have planned for this wg is to paf> keep a webpage updated with, for each CC/country, answers to paf> questions on what rules exists for various things -- one of paf> them being how integration of E.164 numbers is... paf> Does this sound like a "good thing for this wg to do"? YES!