Jim, all - Jim Reid wrote:
On Nov 17, 2006, at 15:00, Niall O'Reilly wrote:
Of course not. Although that _is_ what Jim suggested (see above), I'ld like to believe he was using the phrase as a kind of shorthand, and meant something different, but related, and IMHO actually useful.
That's *exactly* what I was suggesting.
Another "good DNS practice" document will simply not be worth the effort. The people who might read it know it already; those who should _need_ to read it won't have their radar pointing in the right direction.
A document on "good ENUM Tier-1 practice", if it were available, would be something to which the RIPE NCC could _respectfully_ draw the attention of new (or not-yet-alerted) Tier-1 operators.
Indeed. This hypothetical RIPE document might even be thrown over the wall to ITU SG2 as a contribution.
... and this pretty much seems to be in line with what we were talking about at RIPE 53 under the agenda item "Quality Task Force". :-) The action item is on me to gather more input and to report back ("Ongoing work, progress will be reported at RIPE 54 or also inbetween if necessary"); cf. http://www.ripe.net/ripe/meetings/ripe-53/presentations/enu-cs-qtf.pdf . Best, -C.