Jim Reid píše v St 09. 05. 2007 v 12:58 +0100:
IMO, this issue straddles two WGs. The ENUM WG can (should?) look into operating requirements and recommendations for monitoring Tier-1 DNS infrastructure. But it should not make policy in this area as it encroaches on National Matters. ISTR the WG already has an open action item on this topic. Changing the DNSMON service -- or extending its scope -- is something for the NCC Services working group.
Shall we switch ml then to ncc-services-wg? (Just wait for my subscription to be approved).
Wearing my Board hat, I am extremely uncomfortable with the NCC straying from its core function (running an IP registry) by offering non-core services that could and should be provided by others. I hope DNSMON doesn't turn into a repeat of the current layer-9 issues with DNS hosting at the NCC.
If RIPE NCC provides DNSMON already for TLD and root operators, then it should provide same service for ENUM operators. I don't see difference in those two groups (which are heavily overlaped anyway). Ondrej. -- Ondřej Surý technický ředitel/Chief Technical Officer ----------------------------------------- CZ.NIC, z.s.p.o. -- .cz domain registry Americká 23,120 00 Praha 2,Czech Republic mailto:ondrej.sury@nic.cz http://nic.cz/ sip:ondrej.sury@nic.cz tel:+420.222745110 mob:+420.739013699 fax:+420.222745112 -----------------------------------------