Hi. I wonder how you (or we) should define "progress"? We start with an area that was originally agreed to be an IETF responsibility with TSB participation on authorization/validation issues. It then "evolves", at SG2 insistence, to something that is assumed to involve at least some topics we should discuss together. And now we have attained the pinnacle of a discussion within SG2, apparently-secret from the outside world, based on documents that are not generally available to the IETF and the ENUM user community. And, of course, unless ITU-T SG2 is planning to disrupt the Internet by setting up an alternate root, their deciding on an ENUM TLD is only slightly more likely to be relevant than their passing a Recommendation that changes the speed of light. Leslie, Scott, can these documents be obtained and released to the IETF ENUM WG and interested members of the community so that we can further evaluate the level of progress? thanks, john --On Friday, 04 February, 2005 12:35 +0100 Andrzej Bartosiewicz <andrzejb@nask.pl> wrote:
ITU is making progress in debate on ENUM:
Group : itu-t
updated : 2005-02-01 23:58:06
title : [ D 20 ] Administrative control for ENUM
url : http://www.itu.int/md/meetingdoc.asp?lang=e <http://www.itu.int/md/meetingdoc.asp?lang=e&parent=T05-SG02-0 50216-D-0020&t ype=mitems> &parent=T05-SG02-050216-D-0020&type=mitems
Group : itu-t
updated : 2005-02-03 23:58:05
title : [ TD 32-WP1 ] Evaluation of a new gTLD exclusively for Global ENUM implementation
url : http://www.itu.int/md/meetingdoc.asp?lang=e <http://www.itu.int/md/meetingdoc.asp?lang=e&parent=T05-SG02-0 50216-TD-WP1-0 032&type=mitems> &parent=T05-SG02-050216-TD-WP1-0032&type=mitems
Documents available only for TIES (ITU) users.
Andrzej.