Re: [enum-wg] insert meaningless and irrelevant Subject header

Yep .. that what everyone is doing .. Interesting that RU is using a closed system if for M-LNP. Who BTW is running the RU system? -----Original Message----- From: enum-wg-bounces@ripe.net [mailto:enum-wg-bounces@ripe.net] On Behalf Of Nikolay Shopik Sent: Wednesday, November 13, 2013 11:16 AM To: Sander Steffann Cc: RIPE ENUM WG Subject: Re: [enum-wg] insert meaningless and irrelevant Subject header On 13.11.2013 19:24, Sander Steffann wrote:

Obviously not: there is more traffic on this mailing list now than there has been in years! ;-)

Many people just silently using ENUM, that's it ;).

From what I heard Russian MNP (which is should start at December) are using closed ENUM.