6 Oct
2004
6 Oct
'04
3:01 p.m.
Jakob, folks, Tempting as it is to utter a two word response, there is a well known issue with 3264 - to "allow backwards compatibility" (i.e. not make a certain large Router manufacturer's kit obsolescent overnight), you can use sip+E2U as well, so ETSI versus IETF is the least of your problems. We now return you to the adverts. Lawrence On 6 Oct 2004, at 13:27, Michael Haberler wrote:
At 14:15 06.10.2004, Jakob Schlyter wrote:
I'm happy to see people deploying this, especially for companies.
on the technical side, do you know why Kapsch uses non-standard NAPTR like E2U+voice:sip instead of the one specified by RFC 3764 (E2U+sip)?
jakob
no religious issues here;) the fix as per above is in the code waiting for the next build
-Michael