17 Oct
2005
17 Oct
'05
9:13 p.m.
On Mon, Oct 17, 2005 at 07:23:09PM +0200, Florian Weimer wrote:
You would use +12345678901234@e164.arpa, I guess, where the @e164.arpa part could be supplied by the MUA. (Of course, e164.arpa should have a "MX ." RR.)
It should not. Last news about the necessary A RR for "." came from a parallel universe and draft-delany-nullmx-00.txt just misses the operational consequences. Using the "@e164.arpa" part to deviate from the standard mail routing algorithm won't fly. -Peter