22 Jul
2009
22 Jul
'09
12:46 p.m.
Hello Christian, Christian de Larrinaga wrote:
Coudl you please elaborate a bit here? Do you call for regulators to make ENUM mandatory?
I am saying that when an E.164 is allocated (to an operator) by a regulator it should be entered into the ENUM tree even it simply returns the tel: uri for the number itself.
I see: like the CRUE principle (http://www.ukec.co.uk/docs/CRUE.pdf) deployed in the UK tree 4.4.e164.arpa - am I correct? Best regards, Carsten