18 Oct
2005
18 Oct
'05
6:38 p.m.
* Peter Koch:
It should not. Last news about the necessary A RR for "." came from a parallel universe and draft-delany-nullmx-00.txt just misses the operational consequences. Using the "@e164.arpa" part to deviate from the standard mail routing algorithm won't fly.
What about reusing the TPC.INT approach? (AFAIK, RegTP forbids adding MX records under 9.4.e164.arpa, but this impossible to enforce, of course. 8-)