- enum-wg - mailman.ripe.net

Re: [enum-wg] New co-chair of the ENUM WG
by Jim Reid 22 Oct '04

22 Oct '04

Patrik, I think the addition of Niall as co-chair would be wonderful.

2 1

Check on NAPTR Order field value default
by Conroy, Lawrence (SMTP) 22 Oct '04

22 Oct '04

Hi Folks, Adrian picked up an inconsistency between the IETF and ETSI documents. These give two different default values for the Order field of NAPTRs. I propose to change the ETSI document (current proposed default = 10) to fit with the IETF document (current proposed default = 100). So, as a quick (like before the end of the weekend) poll, does anyone use a NAPTR order field value of 10 as opposed to 100? - the ones I've checked use 100, and only mine have order field = 10. all the best, Lawrence

1 0

New co-chair of the ENUM WG
by Patrik Fältström 21 Oct '04

21 Oct '04

This is, I think, the right amount of time after the RIPE Meeting in Manchester to bring up this question. At the meeting, we got a volunteer to become the 3rd co-chair of the ENUM wg at RIPE. The person is Niall O'Reilly. If you have any objections to add Niall, please let me and Kim know. The time to object is (I decide myself) 2 weeks from now, after which Kim and myself will make a decision based on the input on whether we will send a recommendation to the RIPE leadership to add Niall. Regards, Patrik

3 3

Re: [enum-wg] Report of the Irish ENUM Forum
by Stastny Richard 21 Oct '04

21 Oct '04

;-) It seems to be some kind of hide-and-seek. the reports are on the same page, you have jsut to find it ;-) On the left side in the Irish Green you find: ComReg sets out framework for Voice over Internet Services in Ireland spacer Thursday, October 14, 2004 spacer ComReg today set out the framework for the provision of Voice over Internet Protocol (VoIP) services in Ireland.... spacer Media Relase : ComReg sets out framework for Voice Over Internet Services in Ireland Document : Voice Over Internet Protocol (VoIP): A Guide Document : VOIP Services in Ireland: Numbering and related issues or http://www.comreg.ie/whats_new/default.asp?ctype=5&nid=101858 (which is the same page) http://www.comreg.ie/whats_new/default.asp?ctype=5&nid=101857 http://www.comreg.ie/whats_new/default.asp?ctype=5&nid=101856 which is the docuemnt you look for."Numbering and related Issues" regards Richard BTW: Niell, sorry, but this seems NOT to be a draft report, it is the answer to the consultation -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- Von: Niall O'Reilly [mailto:niall.oreilly@ucd.ie] Gesendet: Mi 20.10.2004 20:53 An: Carsten Schiefner Cc: Niall O'Reilly; enum-wg(a)ripe.net; Irish ENUM Forum Forum Betreff: Re: [enum-wg] Report of the Irish ENUM Forum Carsten, I can't throw very much light on this, I'm afraid. As I understood until now, the participants in the Forum have yet to meet to declare consensus and bless the report. This announcement leaves me surprised and confused. I don't understand how it has appeared at this stage, when the Forum hasn't actually had a meeting since the appearance of the draft report. You're right that we don't have a shop-window web-site. On 20 Oct 2004, at 18:15, Carsten Schiefner wrote: > ...is out: > > http://www.comreg.ie/whats_new/default.asp?ctype=5&nid=101861 > > However, the only three pages appear to be mere cover pages or an > introduction - even more, when the second last paragraph states: > > "All of the above issues are further clarified and discussed in the > accompanying report, prepared by PA Consulting Group on behalf of the > Forum." > > So can the actual report be found on the forum's website then? If > there is any website - Google says no, though... > > Niall? > > Best, > > Carsten > > > Best regards, Niall O'Reilly PGP key ID: AE995ED9 (see www.pgp.net) Fingerprint: 23DC C6DE 8874 2432 2BE0 3905 7987 E48D AE99 5ED9

2 1

Re: [enum] [enum-wg] Report of the Irish ENUM Forum {02}
by Alan Judge 21 Oct '04

21 Oct '04

> A draft of the report had been circulated to the Forum by PA Consulting > on Friday 24th September for comments by 30th September. This report was > based on the one circulated and discussed last April and the ENUM trial > to date. We understood that several comments were received and > incorporated into the final document. For what it's worth at this stage, I'd note that most of my comments weren't incorporated and I wouldn't have voted to approve the report in the form that was published. Apart from a number of errors, there is mention of a reference document and various processes and policies that the forum hasn't even seen, let alone reached consensus on. I've found the forum experience interesting and educational. I hope everyone else has too. I look forward to hearing how the trial goes. Regards, Alan Alan Judge, Head of Research and Development Phone: +353-1-7010911 eircom net Fax: +353-1-7010901

1 0

RE: [enum] [enum-wg] Report of the Irish ENUM Forum {01}
by Albert Redmond 21 Oct '04

21 Oct '04

Folks, Apologies for the confusion. Our Press Office had forgotten to activate the accompanying PA Report on the ComReg website. It's there now. A draft of the report had been circulated to the Forum by PA Consulting on Friday 24th September for comments by 30th September. This report was based on the one circulated and discussed last April and the ENUM trial to date. We understood that several comments were received and incorporated into the final document. ComReg had given a public commitment to publish the report by September '04, so we're running late! It also happens to coincide nicely with a paper we published on VoIP last week. Finally, if there are significant further learnings from the trial, the report will be updated in March '05. I hope this clarifies the situation. Best regards, Albert Redmond Senior Manager, Market Framework ComReg. -----Original Message----- From: Niall O'Reilly [mailto:niall.oreilly@ucd.ie] Sent: 20 October 2004 19:53 To: enum(a)consult.odtr.ie Cc: Niall O'Reilly; enum-wg(a)ripe.net; Irish ENUM Forum Forum Subject: [enum] [enum-wg] Report of the Irish ENUM Forum {01} Carsten, I can't throw very much light on this, I'm afraid. As I understood until now, the participants in the Forum have yet to meet to declare consensus and bless the report. This announcement leaves me surprised and confused. I don't understand how it has appeared at this stage, when the Forum hasn't actually had a meeting since the appearance of the draft report. You're right that we don't have a shop-window web-site. On 20 Oct 2004, at 18:15, Carsten Schiefner wrote: > ...is out: > > http://www.comreg.ie/whats_new/default.asp?ctype=5&nid=101861 > > However, the only three pages appear to be mere cover pages or an > introduction - even more, when the second last paragraph states: > > "All of the above issues are further clarified and discussed in the > accompanying report, prepared by PA Consulting Group on behalf of the > Forum." > > So can the actual report be found on the forum's website then? If > there is any website - Google says no, though... > > Niall? > > Best, > > Carsten > > > Best regards, Niall O'Reilly PGP key ID: AE995ED9 (see www.pgp.net) Fingerprint: 23DC C6DE 8874 2432 2BE0 3905 7987 E48D AE99 5ED9

1 0

DUNDi: big brother is watching you
by Stastny Richard 21 Oct '04

21 Oct '04

Big brother is watching you ;-) http://www.itu.int/osg/spu/newslog/categories/voip/2004/10/20.html#a730 Distributed Universal Number Discovery = DUNDi <http://www.itu.int/osg/spu/newslog/categories/voip/2004/10/20.html#a730> The Distributed Universal Number Discovery (DUNDi <http://www.dundi.com/> ), from Digium <http://www.digium.com/> , is a peer to peer system for locating Internet gateways to telephony services. Unlike traditional hierarchical services such as ENUM <http://www.faqs.org/rfc/rfc2916.txt> , DUNDi <http://www.dundi.com/> is a distributed sysem with no centralized authority. An implementation of DUNDi <http://www.dundi.com/> exists in Asterisk <http://www.asterisk.org/> , an Open Source PBX. For further information, see: * DUNDi Core Members <http://www.dundi.com/members.html> * DUNDi Whitepaper <http://www.dundi.com/dundi.pdf> * General Peering Agreement <http://www.dundi.com/PEERING.pdf> * DUNDi Internet Draft <http://www.dundi.com/dundi.txt> * DUNDi Best Practices <http://www.dundi.com/bp.html> * DUNDi Press Release <http://www.dundi.com/dundi_press_release.doc> * DUNDi Mailing List <http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/dundi> More information can be found in a related article <http://voxilla.com/voxstory107-nested-order0-threshold0.html> from the people at Voxilla <http://voxilla.com> . Also worth reading are the VoIP peering discussions on this mailing list <http://psg.com/lists/voip-peering/> .

1 0

and the document from OPTA (dutch only)
by Adrian Georgescu 20 Oct '04

20 Oct '04

http://www.opta.nl/download/04202992_consultatie%20_openbaar_.pdf

1 0

Article: Dutch regulator publishes consultation on VoIP
by Adrian Georgescu 20 Oct '04

20 Oct '04

" The Dutch regulatory authority, OPTA, yesterday published a consultation document on voice over internet protocol (VoIP), concerning "generic obligations of providers of packet switched voice services towards end-users." Read more: http://www.dmeurope.com/default.asp?ArticleID=3738 The document mentioned in the article is however nowhere to be found. Adrian

1 0

Re: [enum-wg] Report of the Irish ENUM Forum
by Stastny Richard 20 Oct '04

20 Oct '04

Maybe this is the reason why some people in Ireland did not know about the report, they do not accept e-mail from the outside anymore. Richard -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- Von: Stastny Richard Gesendet: Mi 20.10.2004 21:55 An: Niall O'Reilly; Carsten Schiefner Cc: Niall O'Reilly; enum-wg(a)ripe.net; Irish ENUM Forum Forum Betreff: Re: [enum-wg] Report of the Irish ENUM Forum Ihre Nachricht hat keinen oder nicht alle Empfänger erreicht. Betreff: Re: [enum-wg] Report of the Irish ENUM Forum Gesendet: 20.10.2004 21:55 Folgende(r) Empfänger konnte(n) nicht erreicht werden: Irish ENUM Forum Forum am 20.10.2004 21:55 Fehler bei der SMTP-Kommunikation mit dem E-Mail-Server des Empfängers. Wenden Sie sich an Ihren Systemadministrator. <mail.oefeg.at #5.5.0 smtp;550 Sorry, Richard.Stastny(a)oefeg.at is not allowed to send mail to enum(a)consult.odtr.ie>

1 0