From the current draft minutes from RIPE 54:
Y. A.O.B.
Niall explained that there is pressure to provide more space for the
Address Policy WG, and the suggestion was made that there are some
WGs whose communities are not be very interested in AP. Are there
people here who wouldn't mind this session being parallel to AP.
Carsten asked if Niall could send this to the list.
ACTION 54.3: Niall O'Reilly to ask mailing list about having the ENUM
WG session in parallel with the AP WG session at future RIPE Meetings.
The meeting plan for RIPE 55 is currently being discussed among the WG
Chairs and the NCC. As of the current draft, scheduling ENUM and
Address
Policy in parallel seems not to be under consideration, but re-
arrangement
to deal with other conflicts is likely and may change this.
Please speak up, anyone for whom simultaneous scheduling of ENUM and
Address Policy WG sessions would be a problem.
Best regards,
Niall O'Reilly
Co-Chair, RIPE ENUM Working Group
