June 2007 - enum-wg - mailman.ripe.net

Session scheduling for RIPE 55 (and future): ENUM vs AP
by Niall O'Reilly 22 Oct '07

22 Oct '07

From the current draft minutes from RIPE 54: Y. A.O.B. Niall explained that there is pressure to provide more space for the Address Policy WG, and the suggestion was made that there are some WGs whose communities are not be very interested in AP. Are there people here who wouldn't mind this session being parallel to AP. Carsten asked if Niall could send this to the list. ACTION 54.3: Niall O'Reilly to ask mailing list about having the ENUM WG session in parallel with the AP WG session at future RIPE Meetings. The meeting plan for RIPE 55 is currently being discussed among the WG Chairs and the NCC. As of the current draft, scheduling ENUM and Address Policy in parallel seems not to be under consideration, but re- arrangement to deal with other conflicts is likely and may change this. Please speak up, anyone for whom simultaneous scheduling of ENUM and Address Policy WG sessions would be a problem. Best regards, Niall O'Reilly Co-Chair, RIPE ENUM Working Group

1 1

Minutes RIPE 54 ENUM WG
by Niall O'Reilly 17 Jul '07

17 Jul '07

Dear ENUM-WG Members, Draft Minutes of the ENUM WG session at RIPE 54 were made available on 8 June by RIPE NCC at http://www.ripe.net/ripe/wg/enum/minutes/r54- minutes.html. Thanks in particular to Alex le Heux and Susannah Gray. Please inspect this draft and send corrections or other comments to the WG list (the destination of the 'Reply-To:' field above). Unless some material corrections are posted either to the list or privately to either Co-Chair before 12:00 UTC (13:00 DUB, 14:00 AMS) on Wednesday, 4 July 2007, I intend to declare this draft "Agreed" shortly afterwards. Best regards, Niall O'Reilly Co-Chair, RIPE ENUM Working Group

2 3

ENUM-AP-53.1: RIPE NCC to examine and report on "strange queries"
by Brett Carr 29 Jun '07

29 Jun '07

At RIPE 54 in Tallinn we commited to providing more detail on the queries prepended with a + in statistics generated last year: In the time period measured (April-November 2006) There were 13797 queries prepended with a + 10081 came from a single source. 2738 came from two further sources. The rest came from 100 different sources. We hope that this level of data satisfies this action point. Regards Brett -- Brett Carr Manager -- DNS Services Group RIPE Network Coordination Centre Amsterdam

3 3

Fwd: AEDG Meeting 6 June 07 draft minutes available on web [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]
by Niall O'Reilly 21 Jun '07

21 Jun '07

This may be of interest to ENUM-WG participants. Thanks, Ronan! Begin forwarded message: > From: "Lupton, Ronan" <ronan.lupton(a)IE.VERIZONBUSINESS.COM> > Date: 21 June 2007 11:29:11 IST > To: ENUM-353-PAB(a)LISTSERV.HEANET.IE > Subject: FW: AEDG Meeting 6 June 07 draft minutes available on web > [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED] > Reply-To: Irish ENUM Policy Advisory Board <ENUM-353- > PAB(a)LISTSERV.HEANET.IE> > Message-Id: <CA3896DB5903C14EAAC9D8E91D1167CB0377C2DF@ms-lon- > exmb06.emea.dsmain.com> > > If anyone is interested in looking at the Australian progress > please see below. > > From: David Gill [mailto:David.Gill@acma.gov.au] > Sent: 21 June 2007 03:30 > To: ENUM > Subject: AEDG Meeting 6 June 07 draft minutes available on web > [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED] > > Discussion Group Members, > > The draft minutes of the June 6 meeting have been made available at: > http://www.acma.gov.au/WEB/STANDARD//pc=PC_2324 > > Please forward any comments or enquiries to enum(a)acma.gov.au. > > > Regards, > > David Gill > Communications Engineering Section > Australian Communication and Media Authority > 03 9963 6871 > > > > Verizon Ireland Limited – registered in Ireland – registered number > 224334 – registered office at Erne Street, Dublin 2, Ireland – VAT > number 8224334A

1 0

Fwd: ENUM Progress Matrix
by Niall O'Reilly 21 Jun '07

21 Jun '07

Let's use the mailing list, rather than just keep this among a few people. Begin forwarded message: > From: Carsten Schiefner <enumvoipsip.cs(a)schiefner.de> > Date: 20 June 2007 23:14:08 IST > To: Nieminen Klaus <Klaus.Nieminen(a)ficora.fi> > Cc: Kim Davies <kim(a)cynosure.com.au>, Niall O'Reilly > <Niall.oReilly(a)ucd.ie> > Subject: Re: ENUM Progress Matrix > Message-Id: <4679A6B0.70306(a)schiefner.de> > > Dear Klaus, > > Nieminen Klaus wrote: >> We considered the need to answer the questions and the result of the >> internal discussions was that we would like to keep the information >> part as short as possible as longer text seem to make finding out the >> relevant information harder. I must also say that some of the >> questions >> are rather irrelevant for commercial implementations. > > please feel invited to suggest a better wording where appropriate. > Of course, we are open to any improvement this data collection can > get. > > Thanks in advance - best regards, > > Carsten /Niall

1 0

Thorsten Toenges/EMD/Merck ist außer Haus.
by Thorsten.Toenges＠merck.de 19 Jun '07

19 Jun '07

I will be out of the office starting 15.06.2007 and will not return until 20.06.2007. Ich werde Ihre Nachricht nach meiner Rückkehr beantworten. Bei technischen Fragen wenden Sie sich bitte an den User Support unter 7777 This message and any attachment are confidential and may be privileged or otherwise protected from disclosure. If you are not the intended recipient, you must not copy this message or attachment or disclose the contents to any other person. If you have received this transmission in error, please notify the sender immediately and delete the message and any attachment from your system. Merck does not accept liability for any omissions or errors in this message which may arise as a result of E-Mail-transmission or for damages resulting from any unauthorized changes of the content of this message and any attachment thereto. Merck does not guarantee that this message is free of viruses and does not accept liability for any damages caused by any virus transmitted therewith.

1 0

Re: ENUM in the blogosphere
by Niall O'Reilly 08 Jun '07

08 Jun '07

On 6 Jun 2007, at 13:27, Miguel Ponce de Leon wrote: > Ireland we are giving the end users a chance to see if there is > innovation to be gained from using/deploying ENUM (As in home > subscribers can register unlike the situation in Finland). I'm not sure that it's quite as difficult as you suggest in Finland. Formally (IIUC), the situation is the same: the Tier-1 registry (FICORA, IENUM) only deals with Tier-2 registrars/service-providers. As a startup initiative, IENUM is offering an interim Tier-2 registrar-of-last-resort service. It may be that there is a sufficient number of approachable Tier-2 service providers in Finland for this not to be needed over there. I don't know. Certainly, the FICORA web site seems to avoid giving any helpful hint. Maybe Klaus would like to comment? /Niall

3 2

Belarus ENUM delegation
by Vat 01 Jun '07

01 Jun '07

Hello! I am interested in presentation of my country, Belarus, in the list of approved ENUM delegations. The state structures do not wish to develop services similar ENUM, therefore I would like to advance itself the given service for people to improve their life,and also I want, that Belarus was the developed state in sphere of information technologies. And I have some questions how to delegee country code +375. Whether it is possible to take delegation on The individual businessman or it is necessary to register ENUM on Limited Company? Payment how many will manage, payment in month, year how many will manage? Whether the coordination with the Ministry of Communications is necessary on that that they not against to entitle to delegation? How long will be process of delegation in case of the positive answer? Whether that any coordination is necessary with whom? Best regards, Dmitry Gurbo --- Собрались в отпуск? Поиск туров - ТУТ: http://tourism.tut.by

1 0