September 2006 - enum-wg - mailman.ripe.net

RIPE 52 draft minutes
by Carsten Schiefner 09 Oct '06

09 Oct '06

Dear colleagues - First of all, our sincerest apologies for not having posted the minutes earlier - we definitely see room for improvement here... Secondly, a warm "Thank you!" to Alex Le Heux of the RIPE NCC for taking the minutes. The first draft is available at: http://www.ripe.net/ripe/wg/enum/minutes/r52-minutes.html Please send in any comments and/or corrections you may have to this list directly and/or to <enum-wg-chair(a)ripe.net>, the deadline for this is Tuesday, 3 Oct 2006, 12:00 UTC/14:00 Amsterdam local time. Further objections acceped in person at WG session, with immediate decision on dealing with them at the meeting (could need more time on list). In the absence of any objections, the minutes will be declared "final" Monday, 9 Oct 2006. Best, Carsten (on behalf of the ENUM WG Co-Chairs) === ENUM Working Group Minutes from RIPE 52 RIPE Meeting: 52 Working Group: ENUM Status: Draft Revision Number: 1 * content to enum-wg-chair(a)ripe.net * format to webmaster(a)ripe.net RIPE 52 - Ceylon Intercontinental Hotel - Bosphorus II - 20060427 - 14:00-15:30 Session Chair: Niall O’Reilly Scribe: Alex Le Heux (RIPE NCC) Jabber: Catherine Carr (RIPE NCC) Webcast and Feedback Archives: http://www.ripe.net/ripe/meetings/ripe-52/sessions-archive.html A: Chair - Start: 14:04 Administrivia: Welcome, Scribe, Jabberwok Niall O'Reilly: Welcome everyone. B: Chair - Start: 14:05 Minutes ENUM-WG at RIPE 51 Niall O'Reilly: There were no extra comments. Any objections? Silence. Minutes RIPE 51 approved. C: Chair - Start: 14:06 Review Action List Niall O'Reilly: 51.2: Carsten has let the RIPE NCC know the missing links and the RIPE NCC is following up -> Action Item 52.1 51.3: Not needed. Done. Niall O'Reilly: Please do boring stuff in between the meetings, so we can do interesting stuff at the meetings. 51.7: Thanks to everyone who helped the Austrians with testing the +43780, lots of people did. They couldn't come, but sent apologies. D: Chair - Start: 14:07 Short News (if any) Carsten Schiefner: No short news really. There is some news about IETF ENUM WG about standardisation. IETF takes infrastructure ENUM into account as well now. Two ideas: 1. Separate .arpa domain; 2. Follow the Austrian approach, branch location register in the normal e164.arpa tree. The problem is that there is only public user ENUM in e164.arpa, which isn't very helpful for infrastructure providers because in public user ENUM it is the user who decides first of all if he or she wants to be part of ENUM and register the phone number as ENUM domain, and secondly, the Infrastructure provider has no control over what the user puts there. For peering purposes there needs to be some infrastructure ENUM in place. The Dallas treaty solved this in Dallas: Short term: Follow branch location register approach. Long term: Separate 2nd level domain in .arpa. E: Leo Vegoda - Start: 14:10 RIPE NCC ENUM Report Presentation is at: http://www.ripe.net/ripe/meetings/ripe-52/presentations/ripe52-enum-ncc-upd… Daniel Karrenberg: A comment: Total queries we get at the e164.arpa service is not the total ENUM queries. We should probably add a sentence saying so, before we see strange things in the media. Jim Reid: Are the statistics for the RIPE NCC's e164.arpa servers? Leo Vegoda: Yes, only the NCC's servers. Carsten Schiefner: Intention to gather other statistics from the other e164.arpa operators? Leo Vegoda: We didn't do that this time. From the minutes of RIPE 51 I thought just the RIPE NCC's statistics were enough. If there is demand, we can try to put something together. Niall O'Reilly: That's what you were asked for this meeting. It would be good maybe for RIPE 53. Action item 52.2 -> Widen the stats. Carsten Schiefner: Documentation of communications in a zip file proposal is fine for me. Is that fine with the group? Niall O'Reilly: To the list. Action item 52.3 -> Stimulate that on the list. F: Gerhard Schröder - Start: 14:22 Follow-up on the Plenary presentation: ENUM and Security Presentation is at: http://www.ripe.net/ripe/meetings/ripe-52/presentations/ripe52-plenary-enum… Niall O'Reilly: Are there questions from the group? Gerhard Schröder: Introduction to his plenary presentation. Maybe the presentation was at the wrong place. When we made the transit from classic telephony to SIP+ENUM, we wanted to know what the risks were. We have a lot of experience in ISDN telephony in security and misuse. Patrik Fältström, Cisco: A comment: You talked about infrastructure ENUM. In the IETF people think infrastructure ENUM are records that are visible in the public DNS. That's not the same definition as you use. PRESENTATIONS Karen Mulberry - Start: 14:26 G1: +1 Trial Presentation is at: http://www.ripe.net/ripe/meetings/ripe-52/presentations/ripe52-enum-1.pdf Carsten Schiefner on Slide 4: Does the trial have an end date set already? Karen Mulberry: the idea is to have the trial run for 6 months, we need a waiver and numbers from the FCC. After that it takes 30 days. So we don't know when it begins and when it ends. Canada is also looking at starting a trial. Niall O'Reilly: Will you come often to the RIPE Meetings? Your timing is very good! Karen Mulberry: I'd love to! Martin Felt: Carriers are interested in interconnecting in North America, that needs to be solved and how ENUM will be used. The US Government guidelines state that there won't be infrastructure ENUM. In your mind, will that prevent everyone to come together? Karen Mulberry: The value is in the infrastructure ENUM, not really in the user ENUM today. Maybe in the future, but not right now. In essence what the USG said is that we authorised a delegation and we'll take it away if you don't do what we say. There will be an industry discussion about how to proceed, but first we will proceed with the e164.arpa trial as that will educate the government organisations and satisfy them. Daniel Karrenberg: In your trial there's not a lot of info about verification. Are you trialling that as well? Karen Mulberry: Two providers that are authentication/verification agents. We have lot of different databases that drive the public network. They are looking at what process to use, but we will work through it. Daniel Karrenberg: It will be in the trial? Karen Mulberry: Yes is will. It's also the concern of the FTC. Daniel Karrenberg: Two organisations that see business in this? Karen Mulberry: Yes, two ISPs that see opportunity in this. Gerhard Schröder: Thank you Karen. One slide shows privacy/security! Thank you for this! I'd like to propose to add this security feature to the working list. Niall O'Reilly: I'm not sure what you have in mind. Gerhard Schröder: It would be worthwhile to discuss security and privacy Issues in the WG. Niall O'Reilly: This is a problem of telco and data protection regulators. But it would be interesting to hear what is developing. We won't put this on our WG action list, but we will be making a call for the agenda at RIPE 53 with some interesting people. The privacy experts are not in the room, we're all technical people. Gerhard Schröder: It's also a feature of a product. Karen Mulberry: In the US we're talking about contact info and DNSsec. We're not sure if we're going forward with that. Patrik Fältström, Cisco: When I hear people talk about privacy and ENUM, I feel that no fingerpointing is important. There are people in this room that mix up the ability of one organisation to find out what customers that a competitor has with the ability of organisation to know information about individuals. Gerhard Schröder: Will DNSsec able to solve all sec features for ENUM? With DNSsec we can't make a trusted tree, just a trusted chain. We need to deal with the security for each user. Niall O'Reilly interrupts: We are out of time, let's move this to the mailing list. We don't have time to explore these questions in any meaningful way. Thank you Karen. Jim Reid - Start: 14:56 G3: Test bed numbers Presentation is at: URL: http://www.ripe.net/ripe/meetings/ripe-52/presentations/ripe52-enum-testbed… Jim Reid: Does the WG care about a test bed, should we try to progress it? Working Group hums: <not really> Niall O'Reilly: Action Item 51.5 stays open for now. Niall O'Reilly: Would it help to have some allocations from other regulators? Jim Reid: Yes, it doesn't matter which numbers we get, just where they terminate. Niall O'Reilly: From the point of diversity? Jim Reid: I don't know. Niall O'Reilly: Let's move this to the mailing list. Jim Reid - Start: 15:01 G2: +44 Update Presentation is at: URL: http://www.ripe.net/ripe/meetings/ripe-52/presentations/ripe52-enum-44.pdf Martin Felt: Is CRUE temporary? Jim Reid: I'm not sure. Peter Koch: Are the specifications for CRUE are available? Are there wildcards? Jim Reid: No wildcards, the specifications will be available, it's not yet as the website isn't up yet. Jay Daley, Nominum: It will be available in 4 weeks. Jim Reid: If you want a copy, let me know, I'll send it. Andreas Bäß - Start: 15:07 G4: +49 Commercial Operations Presentation is at: URL: http://www.ripe.net/ripe/meetings/ripe-52/presentations/ripe52-enum-49.pdf Niall O'Reilly: 5600 domains? Are those multiblocks or all the same? Andreas Bäß: I've not checked, so there are blocks in there too. Niall O'Reilly: Validation is for a year. Coupling the timers for validation with quarantining between number holder before reassigning to customers? Andreas Bäß: No idea how the quarantining is done, so no. Daniel Karrenberg: I'm a happy +49 customer. I had several calls of people who had used ENUM to find the sip gateway. Any idea how many complaints about authentication? Andreas Bäß: So far none. Conor Daly - Start: 15:20 G5: +353 Commercial Operations Presentation is at: URL: http://www.ripe.net/ripe/meetings/ripe-52/presentations/ripe52-enum-353.pdf No questions. Interaction with other WGs Peter Koch - Start: 15:23 X1: Walking E164.ARPA Presentation is at: URL: http://www.ripe.net/ripe/meetings/ripe-52/presentations/ripe52-enum-still-c… Daniel Karrenberg: Why the short TTLs on NAPTR records? Peter Koch: Probably for follow me services. Ed Lewis: Low TTLs are a disaster. All: <agree> Daniel Karrenberg: A comment: NAPTR records for non-leaf nodes can be real and useful. Some people have shorter numbers. Niall O'Reilly: Do you want Leo to talk to Andrei about DNS quality, the availability of servers? Peter Koch: It was a customer server, not a Tier1 server. It had 5000 delegations though. Niall O'Reilly: Let's move this to the list. Carsten Schiefner - Start: 15:34 X2: DNS-WG-AP-51.5 Niall O'Reilly: This was action 51.6 in this WG, 51.5 in DNS WG Carsten Schiefner: The RIPE NCC will put e164.arpa under the reverse delegation checker regime. Still need discussion about what to do when a lame delegation is detected. Niall O'Reilly: Close action? Or keep open? Carsten Schiefner: Close it. AOB None Action Items Number Who Item 51.5 Jim Reid Stimulate discussion on testbed numbers/ranges. 52.1 RIPE NCC Follow up on the missing links reported by Carsten, pending the discussion in 52.3. 52.2 RIPE NCC Widen the e164.arpa server statistics to include other servers than just those of the RIPE NCC. 52.3 Carsten Schiefner Stimulate discussion on the list about the format of the communications documentation on the site (currently .zip). [Meeting closed.]

1 1

RE: [enum-wg] Next German "ENUM day" held on 26 September 2006
by Schiefner, Carsten 28 Sep '06

28 Sep '06

Dear colleagues, > -----Original Message----- > From: Carsten Schiefner [mailto:enumvoipsip.cs@schiefner.de] > Sent: Friday, September 01, 2006 3:17 PM > To: enum-wg(a)ripe.net > Subject: [enum-wg] Next German "ENUM day" held on 26 September 2006 > > > Dear colleagues, > > this is to inform you that DENIC, registry for .de and 9.4.e164.arpa, > will hold its next public ENUM day on 26 September 2006 between 10:30 > and approx. 17:00 in Frankfurt at the hotel "Le Meridien". > > The agenda is currently being finalized and will be posted shortly. > > For further information, please consult DENIC's website at: > > http://www.denic.de/de/enum/veranstaltungen/denic_enum-tage/ (German) > http://www.denic.de/en/enum/veranstaltungen/denic_enum-tage/ (English) the (preliminary) agenda is now available at: http://www.denic.de/de/enum/allgemeines/veranstaltung/ENUM-Tag.html (German) http://www.denic.de/en/enum/allgemeines/veranstaltung/ENUM-Tag.html (English) Best regards, Carsten Schiefner -- Carsten Schiefner | p: +49 441 234-4571 Deutsche Telekom AG | f: +49 431 7163-3972 T-Com Zentrale TK44 | m: +49 151 14525458 Ammerländer Heerstr. 138 | mailto:Carsten.Schiefner@t-com.net D-26129 Oldenburg | http://www.t-com.de/kundendienst

4 3

Draft ENUM WG agenda for RIPE 53
by Niall O'Reilly 25 Sep '06

25 Sep '06

Dear all, Here is the draft agenda for the ENUM-WG at RIPE 53. Figures in parentheses indicate the time allowed for each item, including questions; late adjustments may still happen. Admin (15): Chair: Confirm agenda, minutes, actions (5) Chair: I/O other WGs (5) Carsten Schiefner: Quality TF (5) Operations (15, cumulative 30): Brett Carr: RIPE NCC update (15) Field Reports (30, cumulative 60): Ondrej Filip: CZ (10) Sungwoo Shin: Korea/Pacific (10) Antoin Verschuren: NL +31 (10) Architecture (30, cumulative 90): Robert Schischka: Infra/Ops (15) Patrik Fältström: 3761bis (15) I'm looking forward to seeing you next week in Amsterdam. Best regards, Niall O'Reilly Co-Chair, RIPE ENUM Working Group

1 0

+420/.0.2.4.e164.arpa ENUM launched into trial
by Pavel Tuma 22 Sep '06

22 Sep '06

FYI: CZ.NIC has launched +420/.0.2.4.e164.arpa User ENUM into public trial operation yesterday. Trial is meant only to fine tune validation processes and solve minor legal issues as the technology is proven and Tier1 registry model and provider was already chosen before the trial. End of trial and launch into full commercial operation is planned to January 2007. Press release is available at: http://www.nic.cz/en Currently there are (as of the launch date): - 80 domains registered from pre-trial stage (covering 320 550 phone numbers) - 4 registrars registering ENUM domains during trial - 2 telco operators supporting ENUM in their networks See http://enum.nic.cz for more information about ENUM in Czech Republic. Regards, -- Pavel Tuma Project manager | CZ.NIC, z.s.p.o. | Americka 23, 120 00 Praha 2 | Czech Republic | | T +420 222 745 113 | F +420 220 121 184 | M +420 739 093 901 | www.nic.cz

3 2

New Documents available: RIPE-384, RIPE-385
by Antoin Verschuren 18 Sep '06

18 Sep '06

Guys, I have some sentimental issues with the new ENUM request forms as I found out when I had to use them last week. The new ENUM registrations ask to register an Organisation holding the registration. This "Organisation" template, has a "org-type:" field. RIPE tells me to fill in "NON-REGISTRY" in this field. I'm aware that we are not an RIR, LIR or NIR as in the RIR world, but I do feel the term "NON-REGISTRY" a bit degrading as we are the registry for .nl and soon hopefully for ENUM. Can we invent a new term to use for official ENUM tier-1 registries here ? Antoin Verschuren Technical Advisor Policy & Business Development SIDN Utrechtseweg 310 PO Box 5022 6802 EA Arnhem The Netherlands T +31 26 3525510 F +31 26 3525505 M +31 6 23368970 E antoin.verschuren(a)sidn.nl W http://www.sidn.nl/

2 1

Re: [enum-wg] New Documents available: RIPE-384, RIPE-385]
by Katie Petrusha 08 Sep '06

08 Sep '06

Dear Antoin, It is certainly possible to add a new organisation object type, like "ENUM", to be specifically used by the ENUM registries. This would involve the changes to the RIPE Database. I suggest you to contact ENUM-WG and DB-WG working group chairs to check first whether this change would require only a mailing list consensus or PDP, and then maybe put together a proposal for ENUM-WG and DB-WG and submit it to the appropriate mailing lists. -- Katie Petrusha RIPE NCC > > From: "Antoin Verschuren" <Antoin.Verschuren(a)sidn.nl> > > Date: 4 September 2006 2:26:40PM GMT+02:00 > > To: <enum-wg(a)ripe.net> > > Cc: <ncc-services-wg(a)ripe.net> > > Subject: [enum-wg] New Documents available: RIPE-384, RIPE-385 > > Message-Id: <B33086268D53A0429A3AA2774C83892CDC5850(a)KAEVS1.SIDN.local> > > > > Guys, > > > > I have some sentimental issues with the new ENUM request forms as I > > found out when I had to use them last week. > > > > The new ENUM registrations ask to register an Organisation holding the > > registration. > > > > This "Organisation" template, has a "org-type:" field. > > RIPE tells me to fill in "NON-REGISTRY" in this field. > > > > I'm aware that we are not an RIR, LIR or NIR as in the RIR world, > > but I > > do feel the term "NON-REGISTRY" a bit degrading as we are the registry > > for .nl and soon hopefully for ENUM. > > > > Can we invent a new term to use for official ENUM tier-1 registries > > here > > ? > > > > Antoin Verschuren > > > > Technical Advisor > > Policy & Business Development > > SIDN > > Utrechtseweg 310 > > PO Box 5022 > > 6802 EA Arnhem > > The Netherlands > > > > T +31 26 3525510 > > F +31 26 3525505 > > M +31 6 23368970 > > E antoin.verschuren(a)sidn.nl > > W http://www.sidn.nl/

4 3

RE: enum-wg digest, Vol 1 #184 - 2 msgs
by Robert Schischka Enum 06 Sep '06

06 Sep '06

Hi Carsten, I will be in Amsterdam and can give a short presentation on infrastructure ENUM in +43. Cheers, -robert. ------------------------------------------------------------- Robert Schischka enum.at GmbH Karlsplatz 1/2/9 A-1010 Vienna Austria Email: Robert.Schischka(a)enum.at Telefon +43 (1) 505 64 16 - 15 Fax +43 (1) 505 64 16 - 19 Mobile: +43 664 913 47 78 > -----Original Message----- > From: enum-wg-admin(a)ripe.net [mailto:enum-wg-admin@ripe.net] > On Behalf Of enum-wg-request(a)ripe.net > Sent: Tuesday, September 05, 2006 12:00 PM > To: enum-wg(a)ripe.net > Subject: enum-wg digest, Vol 1 #184 - 2 msgs > > Send enum-wg mailing list submissions to > enum-wg(a)ripe.net > > To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit > http://www.ripe.net/mailman/listinfo/enum-wg > or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to > enum-wg-request(a)ripe.net > > You can reach the person managing the list at > enum-wg-admin(a)ripe.net > > When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more > specific than "Re: Contents of enum-wg digest..." > > > Today's Topics: > > 1. ENUM WG Agenda for RIPE 53: 2nd call for input (Carsten > Schiefner) > 2. New Documents available: RIPE-384, RIPE-385 (Antoin Verschuren) > > --__--__-- > > Message: 1 > Date: Mon, 04 Sep 2006 13:29:13 +0200 > From: Carsten Schiefner <enumvoipsip.cs(a)schiefner.de> > To: enum-wg(a)ripe.net > CC: enum-wg-chair(a)ripe.net > Subject: [enum-wg] ENUM WG Agenda for RIPE 53: 2nd call for input > > Dear colleagues, > > after a bit more than a fortnight, I'd like to renew our call > for input to the RIPE 53 ENUM WG session in Amsterdam on > Thursday, 5 Oct 2006. > > Once more: bring your ideas to our attention, either via this > list or by sending an email to <enum-wg-chair(a)ripe.net>. > > Thanks and best - on behalf of Niall as well as myself, > > Carsten Schiefner > Co-Chair, RIPE ENUM Working Group > > -------- Original Message -------- > Subject: [enum-wg] ENUM WG Agenda for RIPE 53: call for input > Date: Wed, 16 Aug 2006 16:20:57 +0100 > From: Niall O'Reilly <Niall.oReilly(a)ucd.ie> > To: enum-wg(a)ripe.net > CC: Niall O'Reilly <Niall.oReilly(a)ucd.ie>, enum-wg-chair(a)ripe.net > > Dear ENUM-WGers, > > As you may already have noticed, RIPE 53 begins in just over 6 weeks. > Carsten and I, your co-chairs, have already started to > approach the "usual suspects" whom we count on for some of > the presentations. > We would very much appreciate your suggestions for material > you would like to see presented (or, better yet, would be > prepared to present). > Please, don't be shy! > > If you count yourself among the "usual suspects", and haven't > heard from either of us yet, do feel free to contact us > before we contact you. > > We're looking forward to seeing as many of you as possible in > Amsterdam. > > Best regards, on behalf of Carsten as well as myself, > > > Niall O'Reilly > Co-Chair, RIPE ENUM Working Group > > > --__--__-- > > Message: 2 > Subject: [enum-wg] New Documents available: RIPE-384, RIPE-385 > Date: Mon, 4 Sep 2006 14:26:40 +0200 > From: "Antoin Verschuren" <Antoin.Verschuren(a)sidn.nl> > To: <enum-wg(a)ripe.net> > Cc: <ncc-services-wg(a)ripe.net> > > Guys, > > I have some sentimental issues with the new ENUM request > forms as I found out when I had to use them last week. > > The new ENUM registrations ask to register an Organisation > holding the registration. > > This "Organisation" template, has a "org-type:" field. > RIPE tells me to fill in "NON-REGISTRY" in this field. > > I'm aware that we are not an RIR, LIR or NIR as in the RIR > world, but I do feel the term "NON-REGISTRY" a bit degrading > as we are the registry for .nl and soon hopefully for ENUM. > > Can we invent a new term to use for official ENUM tier-1 > registries here ? > > Antoin Verschuren > > Technical Advisor > Policy & Business Development > SIDN > Utrechtseweg 310 > PO Box 5022 > 6802 EA Arnhem > The Netherlands > > T +31 26 3525510 > F +31 26 3525505 > M +31 6 23368970 > E antoin.verschuren(a)sidn.nl > W http://www.sidn.nl/=20 > > > > > End of enum-wg Digest > > >

2 1

ENUM WG Agenda for RIPE 53: 2nd call for input
by Carsten Schiefner 04 Sep '06

04 Sep '06

Dear colleagues, after a bit more than a fortnight, I'd like to renew our call for input to the RIPE 53 ENUM WG session in Amsterdam on Thursday, 5 Oct 2006. Once more: bring your ideas to our attention, either via this list or by sending an email to <enum-wg-chair(a)ripe.net>. Thanks and best - on behalf of Niall as well as myself, Carsten Schiefner Co-Chair, RIPE ENUM Working Group -------- Original Message -------- Subject: [enum-wg] ENUM WG Agenda for RIPE 53: call for input Date: Wed, 16 Aug 2006 16:20:57 +0100 From: Niall O'Reilly <Niall.oReilly(a)ucd.ie> To: enum-wg(a)ripe.net CC: Niall O'Reilly <Niall.oReilly(a)ucd.ie>, enum-wg-chair(a)ripe.net Dear ENUM-WGers, As you may already have noticed, RIPE 53 begins in just over 6 weeks. Carsten and I, your co-chairs, have already started to approach the "usual suspects" whom we count on for some of the presentations. We would very much appreciate your suggestions for material you would like to see presented (or, better yet, would be prepared to present). Please, don't be shy! If you count yourself among the "usual suspects", and haven't heard from either of us yet, do feel free to contact us before we contact you. We're looking forward to seeing as many of you as possible in Amsterdam. Best regards, on behalf of Carsten as well as myself, Niall O'Reilly Co-Chair, RIPE ENUM Working Group

1 0

Documentation of ENUM requests
by Carsten Schiefner 03 Sep '06

03 Sep '06

Dear colleagues, this is to start a discussion - if necessary - on how the RIPE NCC is supposed to document ENUM requests. As a short recap: 1.6 of the "IAB Instructions to the RIPE NCC Regarding operation of the domain e164.arpa ("ENUM")" [http://www.ripe.net/enum/instructions.html] mandates that "all communication regarding the application for a specific delegation is to be publicly archived". That used to be done from the overview page at: http://www.ripe.net/enum/request-archives/ by a link to the respective E.164 CC specific page, eg. Germany at: http://www.ripe.net/enum/request-archives/enum-request-arch+49/ An archived snapshot of the overview page is available at: http://web.archive.org/web/20030826073846/http://www.ripe.net/enum/request-… The RIPE NCC has now proposed a way of documentation where - instead of having a separate page per E.164 CC request - the overview page links to ZIP archives that would contain all sorts of communication like emails, scanned letters and faxes etc. pp. I intend to set the deadline for this discussion to the WG session at RIPE 53 - please be invited to voice any concerns, suggenstions etc. here on the list until then. Best, Carsten Schiefner

1 0

Next German "ENUM day" held on 26 September 2006
by Carsten Schiefner 01 Sep '06

01 Sep '06

Dear colleagues, this is to inform you that DENIC, registry for .de and 9.4.e164.arpa, will hold its next public ENUM day on 26 September 2006 between 10:30 and approx. 17:00 in Frankfurt at the hotel "Le Meridien". The agenda is currently being finalized and will be posted shortly. For further information, please consult DENIC's website at: http://www.denic.de/de/enum/veranstaltungen/denic_enum-tage/ (German) http://www.denic.de/en/enum/veranstaltungen/denic_enum-tage/ (English) - the pages will be updated as soon as new and/or more information is available. You are invited to forward this announcement to your local ENUM communities. Thanks and best regards, Carsten

1 0