Leo Vegoda wrote:
On 15 Jun 2007, at 4:26pm, Denis Walker wrote:
[...]
This is why I think we should focus attention first of all on these questions. But I don't think this is a simple as it looks. Maybe the original wording of policies said we need contact information for troubleshooting. The world has moved on a lot since then. Now accountability is also important. Governments and LEAs want to know "who" is responsible for Internet resources.
I agree.
A faceless role object will not be good enough.
I doubt person objects would be, either. That's what organisation objects, do.
Maybe, but in many cases it would simply shift the problem from the left hand to the right hand. Take my case at home: I have been assigned 8 addresses for my ADSL connection by my Telekom Op. With your approach I could easily hide my personal contact information because that can/has to go into "my" organisation: object. In the end it is the same set of (personal) information under a different heading. If that approach gets us out from unerneath the PD rules, fine with me :-) But I am not convinced...
Regards,
-- Leo Vegoda IANA Numbers Liaison
Wilfried.