All, Yes, it sneaks up on you before you know. Please send in your suggestions and requests for agenda time. It is your working group after all and your chairs don't want to dctate al the entertainment, pardon, the agenda items. The Draft meeting plan is already up <http://www.ripe.net/ripe/meetings/ripe-61/meeting-plan.html> and you can see that the DNS-WG is oppoiste the EIX and the Anti-Abuse WG. In case your suggestions etc. clash with that let us know which slot is preferred. jaap
On Tuesday 21 September 2010 00:45:27 Jaap Akkerhuis wrote: Hi,
All,
Yes, it sneaks up on you before you know.
Please send in your suggestions and requests for agenda time. It is your working group after all and your chairs don't want to dctate al the entertainment, pardon, the agenda items.
Where do we send proposals for agenta items? dns-wg-chair@ripe.net?
The Draft meeting plan is already up <http://www.ripe.net/ripe/meetings/ripe-61/meeting-plan.html> and you can see that the DNS-WG is oppoiste the EIX and the Anti-Abuse WG. In case your suggestions etc. clash with that let us know which slot is preferred.
I personally prefer to have a clash against the Address Policy and Cooperation or EIX and certainly not with the anti-abuse WG. Regards, Kostas
jaap
On 21 Sep 2010, at 07:26, Kostas Zorbadelos wrote:
Where do we send proposals for agenta items? dns-wg-chair@ripe.net?
Yes.
I personally prefer to have a clash against the Address Policy and Cooperation or EIX and certainly not with the anti-abuse WG.
OK. However it's already difficult to schedule WG slots in the meeting plan. There's always going to be contention. The overall plan for RIPE61 is pretty much fixed. If we try to move things around, that creates ripple effects elsewhere. Which causes bigger scheduling clashes. Which forces other meeting slots to move. Which creates even more clashes. Which.... What Jaap was saying is our slots at RIPE61 are going to be scheduled against the EIX and Anti-Abuse WGs. [There are essentially two meeting plans and we alternate between them so the clashes between WG are not always the same.] So if someone wanting an agenda slot has a preference -- "I can present about foo but *have* to go to EIX" -- your co-chairs will do their best to accommodate that. This does of course get harder as the WG agenda fills up. So get your proposals for agenda items in soon! :-)
On Tuesday 21 September 2010 12:34:40 Jim Reid wrote:
On 21 Sep 2010, at 07:26, Kostas Zorbadelos wrote:
Where do we send proposals for agenta items? dns-wg-chair@ripe.net?
Yes.
Thanks.
I personally prefer to have a clash against the Address Policy and Cooperation or EIX and certainly not with the anti-abuse WG.
OK. However it's already difficult to schedule WG slots in the meeting plan. There's always going to be contention. The overall plan for RIPE61 is pretty much fixed. If we try to move things around, that creates ripple effects elsewhere. Which causes bigger scheduling clashes. Which forces other meeting slots to move. Which creates even more clashes. Which....
Timetable Scheduling. NP hard, is it not? :-D
What Jaap was saying is our slots at RIPE61 are going to be scheduled against the EIX and Anti-Abuse WGs. [There are essentially two meeting plans and we alternate between them so the clashes between WG are not always the same.] So if someone wanting an agenda slot has a preference -- "I can present about foo but *have* to go to EIX" -- your co-chairs will do their best to accommodate that. This does of course get harder as the WG agenda fills up.
In case there is an alternate schedule that avoids the clash with Anti-Abuse, it would be preferable to me.
So get your proposals for agenda items in soon! :-)
Regards, Kostas
participants (3)
-
Jaap Akkerhuis -
Jim Reid -
Kostas Zorbadelos