I asked RIPE the following, and the directed me to here (and I book I am now waiting for). I'm hoping for a rather this-month-ish solution though. Consider the following from a fictive DNS. a. NS c.b.a. NS f.e. b.a. NS d.b.a. d.b.a A 1.2.3.4 Will it be necessary to put a glue in for c.b.a as it can be found, upon asking d.b.a? I think it is. Then it is also necessary to enter a glue for f.e, right? -- Robert Martin-Legene, = EUnet Denmark = DKnet, Fruebjergvej 3, DK-2100 Kobenhavn O, +45 39 17 99 00
Consider the following from a fictive DNS.
a. NS c.b.a. NS f.e. b.a. NS d.b.a. d.b.a A 1.2.3.4
If these records are an excerpt of one DNS zone file, it must be the one carrying the DNS data for zone 'a', otherwise there were a mistake because you cannot first delegate zone 'a' and thereafter 'b.a' which is a subdomain of 'a'. So the first two NS-RRs are the authoritative information for zone 'a'. You do not need (and want) glue records here, inside the zone. Zone 'b.a' is delegated out of zone 'a' and server 'd.b.a' resides in zone 'b.a', so the glue record - as shown in your example - should be present. However, when delegating 'a' the glue RR for 'c.b.a' is necessary in the delegating zone. -Peter PS: Here's another one, from zone 'foo': bar.foo. NS a.rab.foo. NS b.rab.foo. rab.foo. NS c.bar.foo. NS d.bar.foo.
participants (2)
-
Peter Koch
-
Robert Martin-Legene