Re: [dns-wg] Policy for Reverse DNS for End-User PA Addresses?
"Brad" == Brad Knowles <brad.knowles@skynet.be> writes:
Brad> But we're not talking about the general solution. Brad> We're talking about issues with DSL providers. So incorrect reverse delegation for customer IP addresses only happens with DSL providers, does it?
At 9:09 AM +0100 2004-07-09, Jim Reid wrote:
So incorrect reverse delegation for customer IP addresses only happens with DSL providers, does it?
No, but for the purposes of this thread, it is not useful to discuss any solution which is appropriate for the general problem but not applicable to the DSL provider situation. We haven't yet gotten to the part where we talk about going the other way. -- Brad Knowles, <brad.knowles@skynet.be> "Those who would give up essential Liberty, to purchase a little temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety." -- Benjamin Franklin (1706-1790), reply of the Pennsylvania Assembly to the Governor, November 11, 1755 SAGE member since 1995. See <http://www.sage.org/> for more info.
On 9 Jul 2004, at 10:14, Brad Knowles wrote:
At 9:09 AM +0100 2004-07-09, Jim Reid wrote:
So incorrect reverse delegation for customer IP addresses only happens with DSL providers, does it?
No, but for the purposes of this thread, it is not useful to discuss any solution which is appropriate for the general problem but not applicable to the DSL provider situation.
We haven't yet gotten to the part where we talk about going the other way.
Now that all that's been (energetically) clarified, I'm looking forward to seeing and commenting on Jørgen's draft. Where I live, wireless is economically more attractive than DSL, and suffers from the same problem. Best regards, Niall O'Reilly UCD Computing Services
participants (3)
-
Brad Knowles -
Jim Reid -
Niall O'Reilly