Reminder about the WG Chair appointment process
Colleagues, there's still time left to nominate candidates and to express support for those who have been nominated. The response so far from the WG has been disappointing and that's making it awkward to decide if consensus has been reached. Please speak up! Even if it's just to say "meh". :-)
I would be very happy if David Knight were to act as co-chair for this working group. Jim Reid <jim@rfc1035.com> schreef op 12 november 2015 17:47:09 CET:
Colleagues, there's still time left to nominate candidates and to express support for those who have been nominated. The response so far from the WG has been disappointing and that's making it awkward to decide if consensus has been reached.
Please speak up! Even if it's just to say "meh". :-)
-- Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.
I too would be happy to see David Knight as co-chair for the dns-wg On Thu, Nov 12, 2015 at 12:53 PM, Shane Kerr <shane@time-travellers.org> wrote:
I would be very happy if David Knight were to act as co-chair for this working group.
Jim Reid <jim@rfc1035.com> schreef op 12 november 2015 17:47:09 CET:
Colleagues, there's still time left to nominate candidates and to express support for those who have been nominated. The response so far from the WG has been disappointing and that's making it awkward to decide if consensus has been reached.
Please speak up! Even if it's just to say "meh". :-)
-- Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.
Hi, On 12 November 2015 at 22:33:37, Chris Baker (cbaker@dyn.com) wrote: I too would be happy to see David Knight as co-chair for the dns-wg I also support David’s nomination. Cheers, — Nico Cartron
I, also, salute our new dns-wg overlord and master! Oh wait, there's some due process we need to go through first. Nick On 12/11/2015 17:53, Shane Kerr wrote:
I would be very happy if David Knight were to act as co-chair for this working group.
Jim Reid <jim@rfc1035.com> schreef op 12 november 2015 17:47:09 CET:
Colleagues, there's still time left to nominate candidates and to express support for those who have been nominated. The response so far from the WG has been disappointing and that's making it awkward to decide if consensus has been reached.
Please speak up! Even if it's just to say "meh". :-)
-- Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.
Mr Knight certainly has my endorsement. Can he simply be appointed by acclamation? -Jim Sent from my iPhone
On Nov 12, 2015, at 11:47 AM, Jim Reid <jim@rfc1035.com> wrote:
Colleagues, there's still time left to nominate candidates and to express support for those who have been nominated. The response so far from the WG has been disappointing and that's making it awkward to decide if consensus has been reached.
Please speak up! Even if it's just to say "meh". :-)
On 12 Nov 2015, at 23:45, Jim Martin <jrmii@isc.org> wrote:
Can he simply be appointed by acclamation?
Jim, the idea is the WG decides by consensus who fills the vacancy. It will be easier to make that consensus judgement if there are more statements of support (or opposition) for the nominees. Clearly, it would be better if a larger number of WG members than we've seen so far expressed their opinion about who they wanted to appoint. That said, there should be some sort of appointment by acclamation at the WG next week.
participants (6)
-
Chris Baker -
Jim Martin -
Jim Reid -
Nick Hilliard -
Nico CARTRON -
Shane Kerr