Hi Jim, On 18.10.2016 11:36, Jim Reid wrote:
The contractual terms are implementation detail and therefore out of scope for the WG. This also applies to the RFP and NCC’s selection procedure.
what other forum you would see fit then for such kind of Q&A?
The WG should only intervene here -- ie by asking the NCC board to investigate -- if we have reason to believe the RFP and/or contract was unfair or defective in some way.
For the record: I am not even only remotely insinuating this by any means at all - I am just a curious Internet Citizen in this regard. But as a side note: how would you come to believe that the RfP and/or contract is unfair or defective in some way, if neither one is disclosed?
The WG must not and can’t (try to) micromanage the NCC’s DNS team.
Not that I have attempted this by any means, I think. Best, -C.