30 Jun
2015
30 Jun
'15
8:16 p.m.
On 30 Jun 2015, at 18:53, Peter Koch <pk@DENIC.DE> wrote:
This is probably an exception for the lack of a drop catching risk, but keeping the domain to maintain a stake in the INT domain might be OK.
That is a remarkably bad idea. The .int domain's supposed to be for international treaty organisations. The NCC is not one. There is no reason why it should "maintain a stake in the INT domain". It simply shouldn't have a stake in this at all. If anything the NCC should be running away from .int as fast as is humanly possible.