Salut Stephane, Am Mittwoch, dem 10.11.2021 um 16:34 +0100 schrieb Stephane Bortzmeyer:
On Wed, Nov 10, 2021 at 04:24:16PM +0100, Stephane Bortzmeyer <bortzmeyer@nic.fr> wrote a message of 13 lines which said:
The data is not sensitive (the DNS is public), not the fact that you request it.
Correct sentence: the data is not sensitive (the DNS is public), but the fact that you request it *is* sensitive.
100% Ack. Any attempts to provide privacy here is welcome. I've taken over the https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-dempsky-dnscurve-01 Dempsky/DNSCurve approach and be glad to provide a full solution now: https://www.fehcom.de/ipnet/djbdnscurve6.html Well, I do not expect to convince people to step into this solution immediately, but for restricted networks (let's say including IoT devices) it might be a useful alternative. This is a different scope perhaps and sharp edges certainly still exist. Though it is an almost zero cost alternative w.r.t. DNSSec. Regards. --eh. -- Dr. Erwin Hoffmann | www.fehcom.de