1 Dec
2010
1 Dec
'10
11:38 p.m.
On 01/12/10 20:27, Wilfried Woeber, UniVie/ACOnet wrote:
What I fail to see at 1st glance is where the RIR and the PDP comes in?
Me too. I think that the approach which Chris is suggesting sits more in LIR territory than with the RIRs. It's a truly nifty idea, IMNSHO. My employer's LIR has found no objection to this approach. Neither has the tunnel broker for my domestic IPv6 connectivity. For example: dig -x 2001:770:13f:1:: dig -x 2001:770:98:200::35:1 Unfortunately, I didn't have the DNAME option whenever I had to set up reverse DNS for a /19 and a /20 in IPv4 as 48 /24's. Now, since this isn't broken, I'm not minded to fix it. /Niall