21 Oct
2008
21 Oct
'08
7:56 p.m.
On Oct 21, 2008, at 10:34 AM, Matt Larson wrote:
This choice was a very conscious decision to avoid concentrating control of the KSK in any single organization.
That's not what I'm questioning. I don't think any proposal is putting control in any single organization. Given the importance of the KSK, the question is why would you ever want a situation where N is less than M. It seems to me that lack of unanimity of the key (part) holders would be just crazy. Regards, -drc