[ If you reply to the list, please don't Cc me, I'm subscribed. Thanks ]
procmail is your friend :0 Wh: msgid.lock | formail -D 8192 msgid.cache
Piet who, by the way?
Beertema.
you should add MX records if a host will at some point receive mail (at its hostname).
no. not at all needed.
The Bat Book advises you to always add MX records
poor and unnecessary advice.
Unfortunately I don't have my RFCs greppable currently, else I could quote the one that says that you should add an MX pointing elsewhere for a host that is incapable of receiving mail
i think we all agree that, if X can not receive mail directly, there should be an MX for X pointing to an SMTP server. the point is that, if X runs an SMTP server, then there is no need for an MX for X. randy