Hi Romeo & NCC DNS team - first of all, congrats to the addition of resilience to the NCC's DNS services! Good to have this aboard these days, I (unfortunately have to) think... On 18.10.2016 10:54, Romeo Zwart wrote:
[...]
The proposal submitted by VeriSign Sàrl (“Verisign”) was the best fit. We subsequently signed a contract with Verisign, which comes into effect before the end of this year. The contract is for the period of one year, with the intention to renew yearly. Prior to renewal, we will look at the benefits of the service and actual market situation at that time to decide on renewing the service.
in the light of transparency, will resp. can the contract be disclosed? If not, is it a contract (draft) that has been put on the table by the NCC? Or, vice versa, VeriSign's standard contract for such services? Or rather - as a result of heavy negotiations in smoke filled rooms behind closed doors ;-) - an amalgam of both? Also, how (far) the three final bidders met the RfP requirements would be interesting. I don't mind if the names of the non-winning two would be anonymized. Thanks & best, -C.