Correct, that is the reason why #9 is there. Patrik On 10 nov 2008, at 19.33, Barbara Roseman wrote:
Ed, I believe 9 addresses some of the proposed workflows published with the NOI. It was not in either the VeriSign or ICANN proposals, but was, I believe, in some of the other diagrams.
-Barb
On 11/10/08 10:17 AM, "Edward Lewis" <Ed.Lewis@neustar.biz> wrote:
At 8:57 +0000 11/10/08, Jim Reid wrote:
can I ask for your support on this latest version?
I'd be okay with this, in general, except for two things.
#1 - I'd be happier without 9 - I mean, just delete it. (Why is it there? Did someone believe there was a technical justification to add an organization?)
#2 - I'd be happier if the list wasn't just a set of requirements but included some "here's a way to do it"s. But then, this point is not critical.
9. There is no technical justification to create a new organisation to oversee the process of signing of the root.
-- -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- =-=-=- Edward Lewis +1-571-434-5468 NeuStar
Never confuse activity with progress. Activity pays more.