In the light of this: Jim Reid wrote:
So the questions for the WG should be IMO:
* Is there value in having the NCC provide DNS service for big/important reverse zones? * If the answer to the above question is yes, under what conditions? ie What do we mean by big or important? * If the answer is still yes, should this service be compulsory or optional? And under what conditions would optional use become compulsory and vice versa? * If the answer to the orginal question is no, what, if anything, does the NCC do about things like lame delegations for reverse zones and the operational problems these cause the NCC?
I'd like to mention that slaving Tier 1 ENUM zones on ns.ripe.net is also purely optional only - for very good reasons. Some of them are hidden in Jim's questions. Best, Carsten