18 Nov
2014
18 Nov
'14
6:44 p.m.
Wilfried Woeber writes:
Nick Hilliard wrote:
On 18/11/2014 11:16, Niall O'Reilly wrote: > >> Let's have RIPE.INT removed. > > > tbh, I see no reason to remove ripe.int. [...] > Please leave it alone.
In order to achieve or conserve - what?
Energy. jaap PS. The last time I looked, all contracts with (g)TLD registries has various names reserved, among them, RIPE. So, default RIPE.$TLD is reserved. I guess that is to stop delegations like ripe.org.