15 Mar
2006
15 Mar
'06
5:27 p.m.
Alexander Gall wrote:
Removing ip6.int is fine, keeping broken zones is not.
Full ACK. Most IPv6 setups I've done so far have an empty zone configured in the resolvers for ip6.int (and did not request a delegation in ip6.int for their own block), because having no reverse name immediately is much more convenient than having no reverse name after a mandatory break waiting for the various delegation errors to timeout. ip6.int hasn't been stable for years, but the situation has become nearly unbearable since the ip6.int zones are no longer maintained. Not all hosts can be configured/updated to do ip6.arpa only (Cisco routers :-) ). I'm really looking forward to get ip6.int removed forever. Regards, Bernhard