If we are lowering the TTL, i support Gregorys suggestion by having a TTL field in the RIPE database.
I would like to have a high as possible TTL on our zones.  A week TTL is fine.


Jørgen


At 13:02 02/12/2021 (UTC), Gregory Brzeski wrote:

Maybe allow users to set TTL on "domain" object in RIPE database?

Allowed values can be constrained to few common lengths of time? The default would be one decided here.

This way users would have a choice.

Gregory


On 02/12/2021 12:49, Tim Wicinski wrote:


I support lowering the TTL on the DS records to 3600.  

I support lowering the TTL on the NS records - I was going to put my hat in for 21600, 
but Mr van Dijk's suggestion of 3600 is very enticing. 

But I liked Mr. Lawrence's suggestion on gathering data on lowering the NS records TTL.  
Perhaps the TTL can be lowered from 172800 to 86400 to 21600, then to 3600, collecting data
along the way.   

tim


On Thu, Dec 2, 2021 at 6:35 AM Peter van Dijk <peter.van.dijk@powerdns.com> wrote:
On Mon, 2021-11-29 at 17:07 +0100, Ralf Weber wrote:
> Moin!
>
> On 29 Nov 2021, at 12:59, Anand Buddhdev wrote:
>
> > We propose to lower, in the first quarter of 2022, the TTL on NS records to 86400 and on DS records to 3600.
> I very much support that and would go even lower for for NS records. Maybe consider 21600 there.

Same. I support this, and I also support lowering NS even further, even
to 3600.

Kind regards,
--
Peter van Dijk
PowerDNS.COM BV - https://www.powerdns.com/


--

To unsubscribe from this mailing list, get a password reminder, or change your subscription options, please visit: https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/listinfo/dns-wg