17 Mar
2009
17 Mar
'09
1:38 p.m.
Furthermore, there are resolver independent implementations of RFC 5011, like autotrust and trustman. - Matthijs Lutz Donnerhacke wrote:
* Anand Buddhdev wrote:
The toolset that we're using does not have support for setting the revocation bit, so we won't be setting it.
Clear statement. Thank you.
Are many people actually running resolvers that understand RFC 5011?
Unbound has support for RFC5011 as well as the current developement version of bind (might be 9.7). So it's hard to say how many people are deploying this RFC. It seems to become the default algorithm for standalone resolvers.