Moderator, Please kindly unsubscribe my email from the group list. Thank you. Cc_ololo@yahoo.com C. C. Ololo Principal Entratek Systems LLC 9319 LBJ Freeway, Dallas, TX 75243 USA -----Original Message----- From: Niall O'Reilly <Niall.oReilly@ucd.ie> Sender: dns-wg-admin@ripe.net Date: Wed, 01 Dec 2010 22:38:54 To: <dns-wg@ripe.net> Cc: <cet1@cam.ac.uk> Subject: Re: [dns-wg] Replacing reverse zone delegations by DNAMEs On 01/12/10 20:27, Wilfried Woeber, UniVie/ACOnet wrote:
What I fail to see at 1st glance is where the RIR and the PDP comes in?
Me too. I think that the approach which Chris is suggesting sits more in LIR territory than with the RIRs. It's a truly nifty idea, IMNSHO. My employer's LIR has found no objection to this approach. Neither has the tunnel broker for my domestic IPv6 connectivity. For example: dig -x 2001:770:13f:1:: dig -x 2001:770:98:200::35:1 Unfortunately, I didn't have the DNAME option whenever I had to set up reverse DNS for a /19 and a /20 in IPv4 as 48 /24's. Now, since this isn't broken, I'm not minded to fix it. /Niall