Seems to be reasonable. Could you please advice us a right place (mail list?) to continue discussing political issues? I'm digging iana/icann sites and still can't figure it out... Peter Koch wrote:
On Thu, Nov 02, 2006 at 01:50:10PM +0300, Max Tulyev wrote:
Yeah, I see the big difference and using double-standards about two domains SU/EU are both not in ISO list :(
But hope we can help to move it right way ;)
... provided "we" != dns-wg, I guess. As David Conrad suggested, the policy issues are best dealt with through ICANN channels. What this WG could address are the operational requirements and consequences:
1) Is there an operational reason to phase out a TLD?
There is _NO_ operational reasons to phase out at least SU. It is operational now and is growing fast. Is somebody disagree with me? -- WBR, Max Tulyev (MT6561-RIPE, 2:463/253@FIDO)