At 19:53 -0700 6/24/08, David Conrad wrote:
On Jun 24, 2008, at 4:34 PM, bmanning@vacation.karoshi.com wrote:
those darned checks and balances get in the way again eh?
The irony of this statement by this individual in this context is _truly_ amusing.
Given http://www.ripe.net/ripe/wg/dns/icann-root-signing.pdf and as far as I know, no response back from ICANN to that, followed by the exchange above perhaps the WG should ask about this situation. (But ask whom?) If indeed the (ICANN) root server operators have misgiving about the experiment, could someone operating a root server express the reasons? I realize that the context of the claim (that the root server operators disapproved) is within the confines of the experiment and not (necessarily) production, but perhaps there's a link. Just real curious at this point. -- -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Edward Lewis +1-571-434-5468 NeuStar Never confuse activity with progress. Activity pays more.