On Wed, Oct 15, 2008 at 12:53:39PM -0700, David Conrad wrote:
Bill,
On Oct 15, 2008, at 9:09 AM, bmanning@vacation.karoshi.com wrote:
thats ok, i said it was local. if you are not familiar with the roll of company/security auditors or the use of notory publics, then perhaps knowledge in that area would be helpful in understanding my concerns.
If you are not familiar with the way root zone changes are introduced, then perhaps knowledge in that area would be helpful in understanding how your concerns are misplaced.
thank you for the educational update. based on the published documents from NTIA, it has not changed since I was directly involved.
If you feel otherwise, please provide explicit details.
I will be submitting a response to the NoI that will outline my feelings ... explict detail about my feelings are not likely to be included. my reading of the six proffered models had, for me, a couple of clear winners, with one emerging as the clear favorite for adoption in the near term. others, including yourself, clearly have their own biases. i don't expect to convert you to the one true way and it is unlikely that i will suaded by your persausive enticements.
It's way past time to move forward.
Indeed. Which is why it is important for each person to review the NoI and provide feedback on the relative strengths and weaknesses in each proposal. end of the day, any of the proposals could work to get the root signed - perhaps as early as this calander year. technical merit may not be the only factor.
Regards, -drc
--bill