On 11/18/14 6:38 AM, Nick Hilliard wrote:
On 18/11/2014 11:16, Niall O'Reilly wrote:
Let's have RIPE.INT removed.
tbh, I see no reason to remove ripe.int.
You don't find the fact that it's been out of scope for INT for over a decade to be compelling? We removed ip6.int for similar reasons, and that actually had a purpose at one point in the past.
If ICANN has concerns about the delegation, then they should raise them formally with the RIPE NCC.
It's been raised informally a non-zero number of times in the past. Why do you think that creating a kerfuffle over something simple is the right way to go? There seems to be a fairly large consensus that the domain should be removed, and Jim has asked some intelligent operational questions about its use that IMO should be answered. Doug