On 28.03.09 19:55, Shane Kerr wrote:
Is there any support for disabling lameness checks for reverse DNS?
1. It seems that they cause some annoyance to administrators.
2. As far as I know there has never been a study showing improvement for DNS users based on removing lameness in reverse DNS (or in any DNS).
These two things suggest to me that the pro-active lameness checks should be disabled, at least until it is shown that lameness actually causes problems.
It would be satisfying for me if those would go to the e-mail: addresses, since they seem to go to changed: addresses. In our company, different people care about DNS and RIPE, the RIPE contacts are making changes according to our requests, but notices are going to them, no to us.... -- Matus UHLAR - fantomas, uhlar@fantomas.sk ; http://www.fantomas.sk/ Warning: I wish NOT to receive e-mail advertising to this address. Varovanie: na tuto adresu chcem NEDOSTAVAT akukolvek reklamnu postu. They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety. -- Benjamin Franklin, 1759