23 Oct
2009
23 Oct
'09
12:11 p.m.
Michael, On Thu, 2009-10-22 at 17:22 -0500, Michael Graff wrote:
Are lame delegations really such a problem that we need to take drastic action? How often would this be checked, and how much liability would be here in modifying what is published? I'd hate to see the papers when a large content provider lost due to a temporary outage on one name server...
This approach is based on the assumption that lameness is in itself a problem, and must be fixed. Also note that we are talking about the reverse DNS in this case, so nobody is going to lose revenue if we a delegation is removed. -- Shane