Hi Robert,
For consistency reasons we're trying to involve the same set of anchors for monitoring each zone. This will probably not scale forever, but we'll try to do this as long as we can.
sounds good.
Earlier we've heard from operators that they'd appreciate if we used a wider set of anchors, eg. add more from outside the EU. So this time we added the following:
[...] indeed, making the measurements less Euro centric is appreciated.
Indeed some anchors are more stable than others. That's not a new phenomenon, I believe it happened to TTM boxes as well. As for what to do with anchors that consistently fail or are down for along time: we don't have a policy defined yet. I'd expect that if a particular anchor proves to be useless for this purpose, then we'll remove it from the pool. (But, after
Well, if an anchor becomes unstable in some sense, it's probably useless for the whole project? My question was more aiming at the stability of the set of anchors as such rather than the operational stability of individual anchors. Thanks for the clarifications. -Peter