On Thu, 2009-10-22 at 17:22 -0500, Michael Graff wrote:
Are lame delegations really such a problem that we need to take drastic action? How often would this be checked, and how much liability would be here in modifying what is published? I'd hate to see the papers when a large content provider lost due to a temporary outage on one name server...
On 23.10.09 12:11, Shane Kerr wrote:
This approach is based on the assumption that lameness is in itself a problem, and must be fixed.
Also note that we are talking about the reverse DNS in this case, so nobody is going to lose revenue if we a delegation is removed.
well, there are still servers and services requiring reverse resolution... -- Matus UHLAR - fantomas, uhlar@fantomas.sk ; http://www.fantomas.sk/ Warning: I wish NOT to receive e-mail advertising to this address. Varovanie: na tuto adresu chcem NEDOSTAVAT akukolvek reklamnu postu. REALITY.SYS corrupted. Press any key to reboot Universe.