Tim Wicinski <tjw.ietf@gmail.com> wrote: > I support lowering the TTL on the DS records to 3600. > I support lowering the TTL on the NS records - I was going to put my > hat in for 21600, but Mr van Dijk's suggestion of 3600 is very > enticing. > But I liked Mr. Lawrence's suggestion on gathering data on lowering the > NS records TTL. Perhaps the TTL can be lowered from 172800 to 86400 to > 21600, then to 3600, collecting data along the way. Aside from performance/load on the distributing name servers, what else would you collect? Or perhaps I am asking: What is your hypothesis, and what kind of data do you need to prove/disprove it? -- Michael Richardson <mcr+IETF@sandelman.ca>, Sandelman Software Works -= IPv6 IoT consulting =-