Hi Dmitry! Yeah, I see the big difference and using double-standards about two domains SU/EU are both not in ISO list :( But hope we can help to move it right way ;) Dmitriy V Menzulskiy wrote:
Hi Max ! Hi everybody !
Now I understand: people who want to destroy Soviet Union - they still want to destroy it comletely :-(((
Maybe, it's time to start CIS TLD ?
WBR,
Dmitry Menzulskiy
----- Переслано: Dmitriy V Menzulskiy/BeeLine дата: 02.11.2006 13:39 -----
dns-wg-admin@ripe.net написано 02.11.2006 13:30:47:
On Thu, 2006-11-02 at 11:34 +0300, Max Tulyev wrote:
Doug Barton wrote:
This domain grows even it have huge price ( http://www.nic.ru/en/index.html ). So people really need it.
A) Wanting something is not the same as needing it.
The magic is who decides what I need and what I don't need.
That you _prefer_ .su doesn't mean that the TLDs it's been split into can't meet your _needs_.
preferences != needs
B) My feeling is that what you're saying here (substantial registration growth in spite of the high price) speaks more to the motivations of the SU operators for maintaining their domain than it does for the necessity of keeping it in the root.
Nobody push people to buy .SU domains. Only issue they do it - they need it. Am I wrong?
Are anybody pushing people to avoid .su? I.e. how much effort are the .su-maintainers putting into convincing people to use the individual ccTLDs instead? ;-)
--
Per Heldal - http://heldal.eml.cc/
-- WBR, Max Tulyev (MT6561-RIPE, 2:463/253@FIDO)