On Wed, May 14, 2003 at 07:24:44PM +0200, JFC (Jefsey) Morfin <jefsey@jefsey.com> wrote a message of 64 lines which said:
BPs should say that restrictions are to be documented both in plain text and decribing case per case the tested reasons of a denial so one can document when the testing is wrong.
They are. Any one can see it by itself at http://zonecheck.nic.fr/v2/.
BPs should also say that the intended registration should be valid when the denial of registration is due to its wrong analysis of the registrant configuration. There is no reason why the first come first served rule would defeated by an error of the Registry.
It is not (the ticket is not closed immediately when there is a configuration error).
BPs could say that the registry should provide its proposed DNS configuration, so the Registrant could implement it to get registered.
For which software? BIND8, BIND9, nsd, PowerDNS?
Will you address IDNA?
Yes.