27 Oct
2004
27 Oct
'04
11:19 a.m.
At 1:32 PM +0100 2004-10-21, Tim Deegan wrote: > How about: "At the present rate-of-change of ISO 3166-1, we must solve > the problems mentioned in RFC 1535 at some time in the next six hundred > years"? :) See my other message. This is a problem that is looming much faster than you are giving it credit. If it is a problem, there is nothing what we can do about it. You should turn to the ISO 3366-1 maintenance group or, alternatively, turn to ICANN that they change the current policy of using 3366-1 for accignment of cctld names. jaap