On 16 Nov, Ronald van der Pol wrote: | On Fri, Nov 14, 2003 at 18:30:27 +0100, Mohsen Souissi wrote: | | > ==> Hmmm... Can you reach them? ;-) I can't ! Going back to a | > discussion which took place 2 years ago on dnsop mailing-list, I found | > the following thread: | > | > http://www.cafax.se/dnsop/maillist/2001-09/msg00021.html | | I guess we are not on the same frequency yet. All I am saying is | that those mapped addresses are in DNS now. So, they are inserted into | the additional section and may cause drops. I agree with you that it | is quite useless (and even harmful) to put them in DNS. ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ ==> That's why I was talking about relevance of these addresses in my first message :-) On my turn, I agree with you can put any IPv6 address in the DNS provided that it is correctly formatted. | Are we in sync again? ==> Yes we are! Mohsen.