On Sat, 25 Oct 2008, Randy Bush wrote:
DLV which I personally believe is non-scalable, non-standard, and imputes a highly questionable trust model into _every_ non-cached DNS lookup
bingo. as i said when it was proposed, dlv is just isc ego producing root envy.
Interesting conclusion. See, the way I understood it from Paul, is that it was not *meant* to scale, as it was an interim solution until not only the root, but large zones as .com got signed properly. You're claiming that isc had both bad intensions and bad code. I think I'll use Ocam's Razor here, and stick with Paul's explanation.
as you likely know, the problem is opensrs, which is behind all the low-cost and open registrars. and we don't want to change to less open ones.
I'll see about getting an update on that situation for you. Paul